Kashmir Portal

A digital Kashmir Info Network

Archive for June 8th, 2009

Kashmir Dispute in its Historical Perspective

Posted by waseemshah57 on June 8, 2009

Kashmir Dispute in Historical Perspective

Kashmir is a powder keg, lingering international dispute, a nuclear flash point in south Asia , basically a simple political issue involving the future of people of Kashmir who have to decide its course through a promised plebiscite but the chauvinism of the Indian rulers rendered this dispute complicated and confounded.

Kashmir dispute has consumed more than 5 lakh lives only from 1947. Kashmir which is having 5000 year old history was an independent country till it lost it’s sovereignty at the hands of Mughals on 1585 A.D. There after Mughals came Afghans then Sikhs then Dogras and now worlds so called largest democracy has occupied it through its military might. About the year 1015 Mohammad Gazane took possession of valley for some time, it reverted again to Hindu kings who ruled it till 1294 A.D. After this Ranchen a Tibetan ruler, ruled it from 1325-1327. After wards the Chakoons ruled it till Mughals invaded and captured it. Later the successor of Nadir shah, Ahmad shah Durrani added Kashmir into their empire from 1753-1819. In 1819 A.D forces of Ranjit singh defeated Afghans and Kashmir became part of Sikh dominion. In 1820 Ranjit singh granted principality of Jammu to Ghulab Singh, the areas of Baltistan and Ladakh originally part of Tibet were conquered by Ghulab singh. Due to death of Ranjit singh trouble arouse between Sikh and British for possession of Punjab . Ghulab Singh gave favorable terms to British and betrayed his fellow Sikhs, British awarded him with territory between Ravi and Indus. Through a treaty on March 9 1846 he got Jammu , Poonch, Ladakh and Baltistan and through infamous treat called Amritsar treaty on March 16 1846 British sold Kashmir to Ghulab Singh. He ruled Kashmir through iron fist and imposed heavy taxes, he also imposed strict laws such as slaughtering of cow was capital offence till 1947 and if a Muslim converted to Hindu he retained all rights of his property but if vice versa he was liable to loose all interests in joint family and property under the state law. Kashmiri peoples struggle for emancipation of their rights became full fledged and organized rights movement after the massacre of 23 Kashmiris by the brutal Dogra Army. The real trouble began when on June 4, 1947 Lord Mountbatten brought plan for partition of India called Indian Partition act 1947. According to this act area comprising of Muslim majority will constitute a new country Pakistan and rest areas having non-Muslim majority will remain as India . But this act was applicable only for British India not for princely states which were near about 564 and were under indirect control of British. These 564 states were given choice either to choose to remain Independent or join any one of the two dominions in keeping two things under consideration first, majority of subjects whether Muslim or non-Muslim and second continuity of their states borders. As for as Kashmir is concerned it was a princely state and was having 85% Muslims and its border has continuity more with Pakistan than with India so there were only two options before Maharaja of Kashmir either he should have declared Independence or announced to accession with Pakistan . But Maharaja under pressure from Congress hatched a well knotted conspiracy, he removed R.C.Kak (then prime minister of Kashmir) and appointed Mehr chend for this slot who was a Hindu from Punjab and also a nominee of congress, bcoz the former one held meetings with the Pakistani leadership as well regarding the future of Kashmir and was known as man of integrity. Later maharaja also removed Muslim servicemen from his police and army removing any iota of doubts what he was planning to do. Maharaja was facing revolt in Poonch against imposing high taxes and this became a popular uprising against his ill motivated plan and he almost lost writ on Kashmir . Later on 4th October Khawaja Ghulam Nabi Gilkar formed first free Government of Kashmir and on 24th Sardar Ibrahim formed government. The laws relating to partition were never honored sincerely. India used its force and captured Hyderabad and later invaded Junagarh on pretext of being Hindu majority area and violated same by invading Kashmir . The state of Kapurthala had Muslim majority but non-Muslim ruler which through help of RSS succeeded in eliminating his Muslim subjects and same was repeated in Alwar and Bharat Pur. These tactics were also used in Jammu province were 5 lakh Muslims were butchered and lakhs were forced to flee mostly during November 4th, 5th, and 6th to turn it in to Muslim minority area. There after this dispute went to UN which passed resolutions declaring it a disputed territory.

The beauty of Kashmir and its picturesque and breath taking serenity always lured many Mughals, Afghans and Sikh governors to think of declaring themselves as independent of their masters. Akbar’s subedar Mirza Yadgar, Raja Sulkhjiwan and Amar Khan two protégés of Ahmad shah Abdali, Sheikh Gh. Muhammad governor under the Sikhs toyed the idea of Independent Kashmir. Even Maharaja Hari Singh personally desired of Independent Kashmir. Chaudhary hamidullah Khan (then acting president of Muslim Conference) also urged Maharaja to declare Independence and assured him cooperation in this regard. In May 1953 Adali Stevenson met Sheikh Abdullah in Srinagar and on the same year on 13th July during martyr’s day speech he said “the Kashmir position was such that it should have the sympathy of both India and Pakistan- it is not necessary that our state should become an appendage of either India or Pakistan ”. After the failure of operation Gibraltar and Indo-Pak war of 1965, many Kashmiri stalwarts like K.H.Khursheed and Shaheed Maqbool Bhat started to think of Independent option in practical terms. Due to which Maqbool Bhat became victim of parochialism, sadism and apathy, was labeled as Indian and Pakistani agent by the henchmen of different agencies who were suffering from kleptomania, obscurantism and apathetic attitude. But these monopolistic vampires would be feeling poleaxed to see Maqbool Bhat becoming heartthrob of oppressed people bcoz falsehood by its nature is bound to perish. Maqbool Bhat was a man with mission and vision, who dreamed about independent Kashmir and had to suffer through out his life for espousing this noble cause. But he stood like a rock against injustice and indefatigable against hurricane of suppression and through sheer determination and resilience rose to the iconic stature in the resistance movement.

Moreover India and Pakistani leaders have time and again made commitments to Kashmiris regarding their Independence . On July 11 1947 Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah said “The second question that is engaging the attention of the Muslims of Kashmir is whether Kashmir is going to join the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. I have already made it clear more than once that the Indian States are free to join either the Pakistan Constituent Assembly or the Hindustan Constituent Assembly or remain independent”. On July 9 1951 Nehru Said “Kashmir has been wrongly looked as a price for India or Pakistan . People seem to forget that Kashmir is not a commodity for sale to be bartered.. It has an individual existence and its people must be the final arbiters of their future”. On July 14 1972 Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Said “History has shown us that no right of self determination can be achieved by proxy. If the people of Jammu Kashmir want their independence, if they want to be liberated .., if they want to be free people in fraternity and friendship and comradeship with Pakistan , they will have to give the lead and we will be with them…no matter what the consequences”. On Feb. 18 1992 Nawaz Sharif said “I made it very clear that, of course, the right of self-determination means that let the Kashmiris decide as what they want. This right of self-determination if exercised by the Kashmiris, of course, they have every right to decide whether they want to join Pakistan, they want to be independent or they want to join India”.

APHC which is spearheading the political resistance movement here has clearly stated in one of his objectives that “To make peaceful struggle to secure for the people of the state of J&K the exercise of the right of self determination in accordance with the UN charter and the resolutions adopted by the UN security council. However the exercise of the right of self determination shall also include the right to Independence as explained in sub-clause (ii)”. It is natural that every person belonging to any group has to abide the rules of that group so no Hurriyat leader has liberty to reduce the right of self determination in to two options only if anyone does that he is violating the constitution of APHC. Right to Independence is basic ingredient of UN resolutions regarding self determination and this right can’t be limited. It is also debatable that if conditions are putted with any right whether that remains then right or not?

Recently former Finance Minister Tariq Qarra(of pro-India Peoples Democratic party PDP) had laid proposal of Kashmir having its own currency which it was enjoying before 1947 but due to unknown reasons it was shelved under the carpet. May be due to the reasons that it didn’t suited those who matter at the higher echelons of power as Kashmir having its own currency has potential and impression of being a sovereign state. Though due to Mumbai attacks the fragile peace process has received a jolt mainly due to jingoism and belligerence of India but the main cause and core dispute of Kashmir can’t be put on back burner forever as its nature wouldn’t allow both countries to do so. So it is better for India ’s own Security and progress to shun obduracy and intransigence and come to negation table without closed chest. Both of them ( India , Pakistan ) are nuclear states so can’t afford war therefore best for them and for entire south Asia would be the restoration of national sovereignty to the people of Kashmir .

Shah Waseem

Student of BCA

Islamia College of Science & Commerce

Srinagar, Kashmir



Posted in Conflict of Kashmir, History of Kashmir | Comments Off on Kashmir Dispute in its Historical Perspective

Time to wake up

Posted by ubaidmushtaq on June 8, 2009

June 3, 2009

Time to wake up


By all standards of international relations Kashmir resolution shouldn’t be viewed as a victory-defeat situation

Ubaid Mushtaq
On one side our political leaders are celebrating the recent election victory with team Manmohan in New Delhi, on the other side the people of Jammu and Kashmir are continue to remain the captives of Indian security forces and prisoners of their conscience. As the belligerent India forces has, by and large, invariably been planning full-scale assaults on Kashmiris. The hush of our political leaders is giving them a clear chance to continue these onslaughts on innocent people. Those in Kashmir who had pinned their hopes and expected that the newly formed NC government can do miracles in resolving this long pending Kashmir issue and bringing peace here have lost all their expectations. The recent incidents in Bomai or the shocking and dastardly incident in Shopian have once again brought the truth that our marionette leadership is weak in stopping the human right violations. The only world that we continued to hear from them is “judicial probe ordered”.

History is witness that the tragedy of Kashmir and the sufferings of people here is only because of absence of an honest, nationalistic and visionary political leadership that could take Kashmir out from the present morass sufferings, chaos and anarchy. Indian security forces are regularly brutalizing locals by using the instruments of imprisonment, torture, killing and rape. We have seen in past Indian soldiers accused of murdering civilians and labeling them off as ‘Islamic militants’ as a way of winning bonuses or promotions which Indian government. It is not just undemocratic, but also shameful that our
State government and political leaders in New Delhi are behaving more like the junior partners of Indian government in torturing Kashmiris rather than protecting their genuine rights.
While speaking in contest of India it seems that the only time Kashmir issues get any attention in New Delhi is, when there is a major crisis or pressure from an international community. But, as soon as the pressure subsides, the issues are ignored or completely dropped.
That’s what seems to have happened during the last few years when a golden opportunity to settle Kashmir presented itself many times. In light of recent rumors about the existence of a U.S. road map for resolving the Kashmir dispute and the Obama’s Kashmir focus India indulged itself in talks with Pakistan as we can observe these days on water issues. History is replete with such examples when issues in Kashmir would come to a boil, India commit itself to bilateral negotiations. However, whenever such negotiations have occurred, it prevented the topic of Kashmir from being put on the table, calling it an “internal matter” for India. Despite clear resolutions of United Nations Security Council, mandating a plebiscite in state of Jammu and Kashmir, India is never ready to act on it. On one side various Indian leaders and intellectuals have expressed their commitment to start bilateral negotiations but on the other none of them have given the real thought to find out reasons behind human sufferings and HR violations here. The two countries initiated a number of CBMs (confidence-building measures) like bus service, efforts to revive mutual trade and cultural exchanges, etc. These CBMs, however, have remained just media hype and a best reason to release the tension and pressure from international community. In the meantime the Kashmir issue has always remained in the lair.
The unfortunate aspect of this whole episode is that the only suffers in this mind game have been the poor wretched people of the Kashmir. Tens of thousands of innocent Kashmiri people have already lost their lives. And still both the stakeholder i.e. Pakistan and India continue to play politics on the issue with no practical efforts being made by both sides to resolve this longstanding issue.
While on one side Pakistan role has changed over Kashmir issue as it is now itself caught in internal conflicts. On the other in the aftermath of Mumbai attacks, India found the best possible opportunity to advance its agenda on Kashmir issue throughout the world. From the day one, it was crystal clear that Indians are hell-bent on exploiting the Mumbai episode for their benefit on Kashmir issue. Although, Mumbai attacks were dramatized by the some external agencies in collaboration with other partners in India to serve their own interests, India is continuously blackmailing Pakistan through various allegations in order to get favorable bargaining leverage over Kashmir dispute and particularly now over water issue. The Indians after 26/11with the support of America and their defense ally Israel has largely succeeded in bringing the pressure on Pakistan and Kashmiri mainstream political leadership.
The situation has come to such a pass where things are getting unbearable on every count and people are coming out and expressing their demand of complete freedom from India’s oppression. Whatever artifices India may try, its image has been tarnished by the treatment meted out to the innocent Kashmiris and towards minorities including Muslims, Sikhs and Dalits (low caste Hindus), which knocks the bottom of its pretence of being a secular state. The recent Shopian incident and the hush of government has once again brought chaos and turmoil in this paradise .All those who value peace and human life in India need to intervene in this matter and should punish the guilty immediately.
By all standards of international relations and on the basis of all measures of sovereignty, the Kashmir conflict’s resolution needs not to be viewed as a victory-defeat situation. But it should be viewed as an alleviation of the suffering of Kashmiri people. India, Pakistan and particularly our mainstream political leaders should try to find out a solution for this long pending issue immediately. That too in accordance with the wishes of the Kashmir people.

(Writer is a student of BBA, Islamic University of Science & Technology and can be mail at: ubaidiust@gmail.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it )

Posted in Conflict of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir (I.O.K.) | Comments Off on Time to wake up

Condemnable act

Posted by waseemshah57 on June 8, 2009

Condemnable act

We as citizens of an oppressed nation (Kashmir) felt greatly grieved and our heart bleeds when we hear of such attacks in our brotherly country. We have saw enough of blood shed in Kashmir, we have saw our near and dear ones being ruthlessly murdered

This refers to the brutal suicide attack near Pir Wadhai Chowk on Peshawar road in which nine innocent people got killed and several others were injured, which is a condemnable act, whosoever are the culprits behind this dastardly act can not justify any cause by killing innocent people. We as citizens of an oppressed nation (Kashmir) felt greatly grieved and our heart bleeds when we hear of such attacks in our brotherly country. We have saw enough of blood shed in Kashmir, we have saw our near and dear ones being ruthlessly murdered, we have saw numerous massacres, encounters, killings, blood of our young and old ones being spilled like water, we have saw naked dance of death and destruction which has consumed our entire young generation. Much blood rather than water has flown through Jehlum. The recent decision of government of Pakistan of reinstating Iftikhar Chaudhary and other judges has defused the crisis but the suicide attacks engineered by invisible hands continue unabated, which has wreaked havoc and deteriorated the law and order and internal situation as well as given a bad name and impression to Pakistan to outside world. We Kashmiris hope that Pakistan will come out of all troubles and an era of long lasting peace, security and progress will take driving seat there and we desire to see a developed and powerful Pakistan in all respects which will be not be in the interests of people of Pakistan only but to the Kashmiris and to the whole Ummah as well. Then it will that country of which Quaid Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah dreamed of.

Posted in Jammu and Kashmir (I.O.K.) | Comments Off on Condemnable act

Yes what else they can do?

Posted by waseemshah57 on June 8, 2009

Yes what else they can do?

This refers to the statement of State’s Finance Minister Abdul Rahim Rather that “Government would probe a probe into the incident (killing of a youth at Nowhatta). What else we can do?” This shows the helplessness of this State Assembly in protecting the rights and safeguarding of life and property of people. Right from 1988 countless probes have been ordered which haven’t bore any fruit and neither any conclusion has been drawn from these probes. And if culprits have been identified in some cases the state is not competent enough in bringing perpetuators of these heinous crimes to book. The cold blood Murder of two innocent youth at Bomai Sopur is still fresh and now the gruesome killing of a youth at Nowhatta and brutal crushing of another youth under a forces vehicle, who is battling for life in a hospital, has added to the anger. This can have dangerous ramifications if the situation continues to remain grim and government continues to order probes just to hoodwink and divert public attention, rather than taking these issues seriously and repeal the draconian AFSPA, which empowers unbridled powers to the Security forces, which it has promised unless its own credibility will be under stake and will be dented.

Every sane person strongly condemns these inhuman acts and even “mainstream” leaders and government itself has condemned these acts equally on the floor of Assembly, then if such things still continue to occur it naturally gives impression that things are out of control of the government. And those who matter actually are pulling the strings behind curtains. If C.M being head of Unified Command Council has issued strict orders to the forces to respect human rights then one fails to understand why such kind of happenings continue to occur with such pace.

People of Jammu & Kashmir want the withdrawal of Security Forces from the civilian areas on the priority bases, rest can be gradual, and the repealing of the draconian laws which are the root cause of human rights violation. If the government continues to ignore these genuine demands of people then situation can take an ugly shape. The probes ordered by government won’t serve any purpose as till now nothing has come out of these processes and if something has happened to these probes is that these files continue to gather dust in government offices and nothing else.

Posted in Jammu and Kashmir (I.O.K.) | Comments Off on Yes what else they can do?